Israeli businessman Maimon David Marsiano faces a DSI summons as investigators expand a Pattaya nominee inquiry into Thai shareholders, hotels, condos and company networks, with Israeli-linked assets worth tens of billions of baht now under scrutiny.
Thailand’s DSI is moving towards its first summonses in a widening Israeli-linked business probe centred on Pattaya. Israeli businessman Maimon David Marsiano and several Thai shareholders are expected to face questioning over suspected nominee structures, company control and investment funding. The inquiry follows August raids on a law office, condominium company and hotel business tied to assets worth hundreds of millions of baht. However, the investigation has now spread far beyond Chon Buri. The DSI says Israeli-linked real estate and other assets under wider examination nationwide are worth tens of billions of baht, with business interests also being examined in Bangkok, Phuket, Pai, Koh Samui and Koh Pha Ngan.

Thailand’s Department of Special Investigation (DSI) is preparing to summon Israeli businessman Maimon David Marsiano and several Thai nationals. The case centres on suspected nominee arrangements involving property and businesses in Pattaya and Chon Buri. Investigators are examining hotels, condominiums, company registrations and the money behind Thai shareholdings.
Meanwhile, the inquiry has expanded far beyond the eastern region. The DSI puts Israeli-linked real estate and other assets under wider examination, totalling tens of billions of baht nationwide.
The latest development emerged on Tuesday, September 8. Investigators are preparing to approve summonses for the first group of suspects. Marsiano is expected to be among them, alongside Thai nationals suspected of acting as nominees. However, Marsiano has not been charged and no summons date has been announced. The investigation remains active under Special Case No. 135/2569.
DSI targets Pattaya nominee structures as Marsiano-linked businesses come under sharper scrutiny
Angsuket Wisutwattanasak heads the special case team. He is Director of the Justice Facilitation Affairs Division. The investigation concerns suspected breaches of the Foreign Business Act B.E. 2542. In particular, the DSI has cited Sections 36, 37 and 41. Investigators are seeking to establish who funded the businesses and who exercised actual control.
The case gathered pace after coordinated raids on August 21. Officers searched three locations across Pattaya and Bang Lamung. They targeted KT International Law & Business, Cozy Beach View Co., Ltd. and Lotus Paradise Development Co., Ltd. During those searches, officers seized company records, computers, electronic communications and other evidence. The material was subsequently taken for detailed examination.
That evidence has pushed the investigation towards its next stage. The DSI says its examination strengthened suspicions surrounding several corporate structures. Consequently, the special case committee is preparing to consider its first summonses. Investigators will question the source of investment capital and the role of Thai shareholders. They will also seek to establish who ultimately controlled the businesses.
Marsiano is the principal foreign figure identified in the current special case. The DSI describes him as a significant Israeli businessman operating mainly in Thailand’s eastern region. His connection with Cozy Beach View has become central to the inquiry. The company operates a condominium business in Nong Prue, Bang Lamung. It reportedly holds assets worth several hundred million baht.
Cozy Beach View shareholdings put Thai investors and Marsiano’s 49% stake under closer DSI scrutiny
According to investigators, Marsiano holds 49% of Cozy Beach View. Two Thai women each hold another 25.5%. One shareholder is identified only as Ms B, while the other is identified as Ms D. On company records, therefore, the two Thai shareholders together control 51%. Marsiano’s recorded holding remains at 49%.
Notably, Ms B reportedly worked for the law office involved in registering Cozy Beach View. She has appeared as a company shareholder since 2010. Investigators are examining whether she supplied the capital recorded under her name. They are also tracing the original source of funds behind her stake. That financial trail is now a central element of the investigation.
The DSI suspects Thai shareholders may have been used for foreign beneficial owners. Accordingly, investigators are examining whether the registered percentages reflected the actual investment arrangements. They are also looking at who exercised practical control over the businesses. The issue goes beyond the names appearing on company documents. Instead, investigators are following the money behind those names.
The DSI says it has encountered concealed or disguised arrangements involving some Israeli investors. Under such structures, foreign nationals can appear openly as minority shareholders or directors. Thai shareholders can then provide the formal majority within the company. Yet investigators want to establish whether those Thai shareholders supplied genuine capital. That question is being examined across the Pattaya companies.
KT International records widen nominee probe beyond Cozy Beach View into multiple company registrations
KT International Law & Business has consequently become another major focus. The Pattaya law office handled the registration of Cozy Beach View. Investigators suspect employees appeared as shareholders for foreign beneficial owners. More significantly, the August 21 search produced evidence extending beyond Cozy Beach View. Officers found records concerning numerous other company registrations handled through the office.
The DSI seized those records for further examination. As part of that work, investigators are comparing shareholder names across different legal entities. They are checking whether law-office employees repeatedly appeared as Thai investors. They are also tracing whether those individuals possessed the money required for their recorded stakes. The records could therefore widen Special Case No. 135/2569 substantially.
However, the DSI has not said every company registered through the office violated Thai law. Each company is being examined separately. Investigators are looking at ownership, financing, directors and actual business control. In parallel, they are comparing corporate filings with financial and government information. Repeated appearances by the same shareholders are receiving particular attention.
Lotus Paradise Development provides another important strand of that inquiry. The company operates a hotel business in Pattaya. The hotel connected with the August operation was identified as Shilat Avenue Pattaya. Lotus Paradise used the same law office for its registration in 2012. Once again, Ms B appeared in the company structure.
Lotus Paradise links deepen as DSI checks founders, shareholders and investment sources in Pattaya
According to investigators, Ms B became one of the company’s founders. Her involvement therefore overlaps with her shareholding at Cozy Beach View. The DSI is examining whether she personally financed both investments. Additionally, investigators are comparing her role across the two companies. Her repeated appearance has become part of the corporate trail now under scrutiny.
The Lotus Paradise shareholder structure later changed. Between 2013 and 2015, the law-office owner became a shareholder. The DSI identifies him only as Mr S. Subsequently, another Thai woman appeared in company records. She is identified only as Ms O and became a shareholder from 2022 onwards.
Investigators then compared Ms O’s corporate role with government employment information. Social security records showed her working for an aluminium business in Samut Sakhon. The DSI is therefore examining the source of her investment in Lotus Paradise. Investigators are also assessing whether her circumstances matched the capital recorded under her name. That comparison illustrates the financial checks now being applied across the case.
The inquiry has consequently moved beyond corporate paperwork. Investigators are comparing registered ownership with employment histories and financial information. They are also examining social security records and company statements. Where a Thai shareholder appears in a substantial company, investigators are tracing the investment behind that holding. The same process is being applied across connected entities.
DSI maps overlapping Pattaya companies as August raids expose assets running into hundreds of millions
Meanwhile, the DSI has identified overlaps between Cozy Beach View and Lotus Paradise Development. Shareholders and company figures appear across the interconnected structures. Together, the businesses reportedly possess assets running into hundreds of millions of baht. Investigators are now following those links through registration histories and financial records. The Pattaya inquiry therefore covers legal services, condominiums, hotels and property interests.
The August 21 operation itself involved several government agencies. Justice Minister Police Lt Gen Rutthaphon Naowarat took part in the raids. Deputy Interior Minister Worasit Liangprasit also joined the operation. In addition, the DSI worked with the Department of Provincial Administration and Royal Thai Police. Search warrants covered the three principal Pattaya and Bang Lamung targets.
Each search addressed a different part of the suspected structure. At KT International Law & Business, investigators concentrated on company registrations and suspected nominee arrangements. At Cozy Beach View, they examined the condominium company’s ownership and financing. Separately, Lotus Paradise Development was searched over its hotel operation and overlapping shareholders. Officers removed corporate records, financial documents and electronic equipment from the locations.
Seized records move Pattaya special case towards summonses and detailed questioning over control
Since then, investigators have been matching the seized material against other information. Company records are being compared with employment and social security data. Financial information is also being examined alongside historical shareholder records. Moreover, investigators are mapping changes in directors and shareholders across several years. Those records can expose repeated links between otherwise separate companies.
The investigation is now approaching its first formal questioning stage. Marsiano is expected to receive a summons once the committee gives approval. Thai shareholders suspected of acting as nominees are also expected to be called. For now, however, investigators have not announced how many people will face questioning. Nor have they disclosed the precise case against each individual.
The questioning is expected to focus heavily on capital and control. Investigators want to establish where investment money originated. They also want to know whether Thai shareholders personally funded their stakes. Equally, the DSI is examining who directed company operations and ultimately benefited from them. Property and land interests connected with the businesses are also being traced.
Historical company records have therefore assumed greater importance. Investigators are examining when shareholders entered companies and when they left. They are also looking for recurring directors and investors across separate entities. Furthermore, the DSI is examining additional companies registered through KT International. Records seized there concern numerous legal entities beyond the two businesses already identified.
Probe expands beyond Pattaya as DSI examines Israeli-linked assets worth tens of billions nationwide
Those companies are not automatically part of the existing special case. Nevertheless, investigators are reviewing their registrations for similar patterns. Some could eventually be incorporated into Special Case No. 135/2569. Others could potentially lead to separate investigations. The DSI has not announced any decision on that point.
Tuesday’s briefing also revealed the much larger geographical scope of the inquiry. Angsuket said investigators were examining Israeli-linked business interests across several parts of Thailand. The examination now extends well beyond Pattaya and Chon Buri. In particular, he identified Pai in Mae Hong Son and two islands in Surat Thani. Those locations are Koh Pha Ngan and Koh Samui.
On another front, Phuket and Bangkok are included in the wider examination. The DSI says Israeli-linked real estate and other assets nationwide are worth tens of billions of baht. That figure dwarfs the hundreds of millions connected with the directly examined Pattaya businesses. However, the DSI has not said the entire nationwide asset pool is illegal. Instead, the figure describes the scale of interests linked to networks being examined.
That distinction remains important to the scope of the investigation. Individual companies, properties and transactions are being examined separately. The DSI is checking whether particular businesses used Thai nominee shareholders. It is also investigating whether specific property arrangements breached Thai law. The nationwide asset estimate does not itself establish an offence.
DSI separates Kantor inquiry from Marsiano case while examining wider Israeli business connections
Angsuket said investigators had found several Israeli nationals operating businesses through concealed transactions. The DSI is examining those arrangements individually. In some cases, foreign investors appear openly within corporate records. Thai shareholders then provide the formal majority. Investigators are seeking to establish whether those Thai investors supplied their own capital.
At the same time, officials are tracing who exercised actual business control. They are examining land purchases, property interests, hotels and condominium businesses. The DSI says the volume of company and asset records is substantial. Officials have also said the investigation could have significant national economic implications. That has added weight to the examination of company registrations beyond Pattaya.
Separately, the inquiry has reached into wider Israeli community connections. Investigators examined whether Marsiano had a direct connection with Thailand’s Chief Rabbi, Yosef Chaim Kantor. Kantor obtained Thai nationality in 2017. However, the DSI has found no direct business relationship between Kantor and Marsiano. Investigators have also found no direct financial transaction connecting the two men.
Crucially, the DSI has found no evidence that Kantor breached the Foreign Business Act. He therefore remains outside Special Case No. 135/2569. Nonetheless, investigators are separately gathering information concerning his activities after obtaining Thai nationality. That examination arose while the DSI mapped wider Israeli business and community connections.
DSI says no Kantor offence established as wider Israeli community and business links face review
Officials found that numerous Israeli-owned businesses were socially connected through members of Thailand’s Israeli community. The DSI believes Marsiano and Kantor may know each other through those networks. However, investigators have not established a business or financial relationship between them. Any investigation involving Kantor would therefore remain separate from the Marsiano case.
If evidence of an offence emerged, investigators could seek another special case. The DSI Director-General would decide whether to accept such a case. At present, no such offence has been established. Kantor and the Chabad Thailand network have not commented publicly on the investigation.
The DSI has also described the wider Israeli presence across several Thai destinations. Officials said some Israeli nationals come solely for tourism. Others remain for longer periods and establish businesses. Some may eventually seek Thai nationality. The department also referred to funds supporting Israelis living in Thailand, including military veterans.
According to the DSI, many Israelis regard Thailand as safe and peaceful. Yet that wider community presence is separate from establishing any business offence. Special Case No. 135/2569 remains focused on suspected nominee arrangements, corporate financing and actual control. The DSI is also examining associated property and land interests.
Financial trail takes centre stage as DSI checks Thai shareholders, capital sources and company control
In practical terms, investigators are trying to answer several financial questions. They want to establish who supplied the money behind Thai shareholdings. They also want to know whether registered shareholders genuinely controlled their investments. Finally, they are examining who managed and benefited from the underlying businesses.
For that reason, the August 21 seizures have become central to the case. The records provide historical information covering several companies and shareholders. Government databases supply another layer of evidence. Social Security records have already raised questions about Ms O’s employment background. Similarly, historical company records highlighted Ms B’s repeated involvement.
The KT International records could now identify further overlapping shareholders. Investigators are therefore checking numerous additional legal entities established through the office. The DSI has not disclosed how many companies are under examination. Still, the records extend beyond Cozy Beach View and Lotus Paradise Development. That creates the possibility of further investigative action.
For now, the immediate legal focus remains on Marsiano and the Thai shareholders. The special case committee must first approve the summonses. Investigators will then question those called about ownership, financing and company control. Marsiano remains under investigation and has not been charged. Likewise, the Thai shareholders remain under investigation.
Foreign Business Act inquiry broadens from Pattaya companies to Israeli-linked interests nationwide
The DSI has cited Sections 36, 37 and 41 of the Foreign Business Act. Those provisions form the legal framework now being examined. No court has found the individuals under investigation guilty of an offence. The DSI must first establish whether the suspected nominee structures breached Thai law.
Beyond the Pattaya case, the nationwide examination continues. What began with three searches has expanded into a review of numerous company records. Investigators are also examining Israeli-linked interests across several major Thai destinations. Chon Buri remains the centre of the existing special case, while other locations form the wider inquiry.
In Surat Thani, officials specifically identified Koh Pha Ngan and Koh Samui. Pai was identified in Mae Hong Son. Phuket and Bangkok are also included. Across those areas, the DSI says Israeli-linked real estate and other assets under examination reach tens of billions of baht.
Pattaya nevertheless provides the clearest corporate chain disclosed so far. It runs through KT International Law & Business, Cozy Beach View and Lotus Paradise Development. Several individuals appear across those structures. Meanwhile, the directly examined businesses hold assets worth hundreds of millions of baht.
August raid evidence drives next stage as DSI prepares summonses over ownership, funding and control
The August raids gave investigators a substantial cache of corporate evidence. That material is now being matched against shareholder histories, employment data and financial information. More importantly, the inquiry has moved beyond simply identifying names on company records. Investigators are now tracing the money behind those names.
That financial trail will shape the next stage of Special Case No. 135/2569. Investigators want to establish who actually funded the Thai stakes. They also want to determine who exercised effective control over the companies. The first summonses will bring those questions directly to Marsiano and the Thai shareholders.
Raids in Pattaya on Friday led by two ministers targeting Israeli business networks and legal advisors
100 Phuket firms with revenues of 5 billion using naturalised citizens investigated after police raids
Until then, Marsiano remains under investigation without charge. Kantor remains outside the existing special case, with no Foreign Business Act offence established. Meanwhile, the DSI continues tracing company registrations, shareholders, property interests and investment capital across its widening inquiry.
Join the Thai News forum, follow Thai Examiner on Facebook here
Receive all our stories as they come out on Telegram here
Follow Thai Examiner here
Further reading:
Frenchman’s Koh Samui business empire enmeshed in knotty police probe of nominee firms and pot farm
Drive against foreign owned property and business on Koh Samui and Koh Phangan now targets leases
International reservations system used by hotels targeted in latest Koh Phangan swoop by ministers
Anutin visits Koh Phangan as nominee crackdown shows 68% of firms with foreign ownership links
Blitzkrieg on foreign firms and enterprises on Koh Phangan continues with French owned resort busted
Russian-Chinese Koh Phangan alliance to sell drugs to foreigners. Accused entered Thailand illegally
Crackdown aimed at upending foreign business trade moves from Koh Phangan to Phuket. Four arrested
Crackdown to wipe out foreign business abuses and ownership on Koh Phangan & Koh Samui intensifies
















