New evidence jolts Thailand’s local government exam scandal as Rome reveals a 2024 document naming Anutin in the Burapha University contract dispute. Interior Ministry official Nirat denies interference as MPs widen their probe beyond civil servants.
Senior Interior Ministry official Nirat Pongsitthithavorn has firmly denied corruption or political interference in Thailand’s local government exam scandal, hitting back at claims by People’s Party MP Rangsiman Rome. Mr Nirat insists Burapha University was dropped to prevent damage to the state. However, the parliamentary probe took a significant turn with new documentary evidence. A 2024 document concerning efforts to block Burapha University from the contract names Anutin Charnvirakul, then Deputy Prime Minister and now Prime Minister. Mr Rangsiman says unexplained fraud complaints preceded the university’s removal, while the subsequent examinations faced far more serious corruption. He insists the probe must now examine a possible political dimension and warned against “cutting off the political aspect.”
A parliamentary investigation into Thailand’s local government recruitment scandal has widened after MPs received crucial new evidence. Notably, a 2024 document names Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul, who was Deputy Prime Minister at the time.
The material concerns efforts to prevent Burapha University from securing an examination contract. However, the committee has made no finding of wrongdoing against Mr Anutin.
Rangsiman Rome disclosed the development following a parliamentary committee meeting on Thursday, August 6. Mr Rangsiman is a People’s Party party-list MP. He also chairs the House Committee on Law, Justice and Human Rights. The panel is investigating corruption involving recruitment for local government positions from 2024 to 2026.
Burapha University contract cancellation comes under scrutiny as MPs examine unexplained fraud claims
Importantly, Mr Rangsiman said Thursday’s hearing produced substantial additional information. The investigation is no longer focused solely on corruption surrounding the examinations. Instead, MPs are examining decisions made before the disputed recruitment exercises took place. Central to that inquiry is the earlier selection of Burapha University.
Burapha University had originally won the selection process to conduct the competitive examination. Subsequently, Department of Local Administration executives discussed ways to cancel that result.
Complaints accusing the university of involvement in examination fraud were cited during those discussions. Yet Mr Rangsiman said the factual basis for those complaints remains unexplained.
In particular, nobody has established what evidence supported the accusations against Burapha University, according to Mr Rangsiman. That gap has become increasingly important to the committee. Burapha University eventually lost the contract. Later examinations were then hit by substantially more serious corruption problems.
Against that backdrop, Mr Rangsiman questioned whether the original cancellation was carried out with proper intentions. The committee is now examining the circumstances behind the decision. It also wants to establish how the effort to remove Burapha University developed.
Document naming Anutin in January 2024 meeting draws scrutiny as MPs examine university contract
Separately, MPs have obtained documentary evidence linked to the earlier process. One document is a letter of inquiry addressed to the Treasury Department. Crucially, it refers to a meeting held on January 17, 2024. The document also contains the name of Anutin Charnvirakul.
At that stage, Mr Anutin was serving as Deputy Prime Minister. According to Mr Rangsiman, the document indicates an effort to prevent Burapha University from receiving the contract. Nevertheless, he has not concluded that Mr Anutin personally directed that effort. Nor has the committee established the extent of any involvement.
Even so, Mr Rangsiman said the reference to Mr Anutin required further investigation. The committee is therefore examining the document alongside other evidence received during its inquiry. It will also scrutinise the circumstances surrounding the January 17 meeting.
In parallel, representatives from Burapha University appeared before the committee on Thursday. They provided further information about the university’s experience during the selection process. Mr Rangsiman said their evidence highlighted several suspicious activities requiring closer examination.
MPs examine possible political links as Interior Ministry rejects corruption and interference claims
As part of this, MPs are examining whether the controversy reaches beyond career civil servants. Mr Rangsiman said the information suggested possible links to political policy. However, he stressed that the extent of Mr Anutin’s involvement could not yet be determined.
At the same time, Mr Rangsiman warned against allowing the investigation to finish with civil servants. Such an outcome, he said, would amount to “cutting off the political aspect.” Accordingly, the committee intends to compile the documents and testimony before pursuing the investigation further.
In response, the Department of Local Administration has firmly rejected suggestions of corruption or improper interference. Senior Interior Ministry official Nirat Pongsitthithavorn issued a detailed clarification on Friday, August 7. He directly challenged Mr Rangsiman’s account of the earlier examination process.
Mr Nirat is Deputy Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Interior. He is also Acting Director-General of the Department of Local Administration. His statement addressed the competitive examination for recruiting civil servants and local government employees in 2023.
Specifically, Mr Nirat responded to observations made publicly by Mr Rangsiman following Thursday’s committee meeting. He said those comments could leave the public with a mistaken impression. That impression concerned the department’s honesty and whether outsiders had interfered in its decisions.
Nirat says Burapha University contract was cancelled to prevent state damage and denies interference
On another front, Mr Nirat addressed the cancellation involving Burapha University. He provided the department’s explanation for abandoning the arrangement. According to his account, the decision concerned potential damage to the state. He therefore denied that corruption or interference drove the cancellation.
The dispute covers several connected stages of the recruitment process. These include selecting an organisation to conduct competitive examinations and subsequently cancelling that selection. It also covers the later examinations used to appoint local government officials and employees.
For its part, the department maintains that its actions were legitimate. Mr Nirat rejected suggestions that officials acted dishonestly during the process. He also denied interference in the 2023 local government examination.
Meanwhile, he addressed plans for a new examination in 2025. Mr Nirat said the new process would be rigorous and transparent. His statement consequently presented a sharply different account from concerns raised before the parliamentary committee.
Committee widens inquiry into Burapha University contract as January 2024 meeting becomes key focus
The committee, however, is continuing its investigation. Its inquiry now stretches from suspected examination corruption to decisions surrounding the earlier procurement process. More specifically, MPs are examining how Burapha University won the selection and why that result was cancelled.
At issue is the sequence leading to the university’s removal. Burapha University initially secured the contract through the selection process. Department executives later discussed cancelling the result after complaints linked the university with examination fraud. According to Mr Rangsiman, the basis for those complaints has still not been adequately explained.
Afterwards, Burapha University lost the contract. More serious corruption then affected subsequent examinations, according to information presented by the committee chairman. That sequence has prompted MPs to scrutinise the motives behind the original cancellation.
Beyond that, the January 17, 2024 meeting has become another focus. The letter obtained by the committee refers directly to that meeting. More significantly, it mentions Mr Anutin, then serving as Deputy Prime Minister.
Rome says document points to effort to block Burapha University as competing accounts sharpen inquiry
Mr Rangsiman said the document indicates an attempt to stop Burapha University obtaining the contract. Still, he has not accused Mr Anutin of wrongdoing. The committee has likewise reached no conclusion that he participated in improper conduct.
Rather, Mr Rangsiman argues that the documentary reference requires further examination. Evidence from Burapha University representatives has added to that demand. Taken together, he believes the material prevents investigators from restricting their inquiry to civil servants.
By contrast, Mr Nirat maintains that the Department of Local Administration acted properly. He says the Burapha University decision concerned possible damage to the state. He also rejects claims of corruption or interference in the examination arrangements.
The competing accounts have now sharpened the parliamentary inquiry. Mr Rangsiman points to unexplained complaints surrounding the original winning bidder. He also cites later corruption problems, Burapha University’s evidence and the newly obtained 2024 document.
Nirat defends department as committee compiles evidence and examines possible political connections
Mr Nirat, conversely, has defended the department’s decisions and disputed the committee chairman’s interpretation. His clarification maintains that the cancellation had legitimate grounds. It also rejects any suggestion that officials dishonestly manipulated the examination process.
For now, the committee is compiling the additional information obtained during its hearings. Its examination covers the original selection, cancellation process and subsequent recruitment examinations.
Two officials face serious criminal charges in exam scandal. Reports suggest 100 people may be called in
Rome alleges a criminal conspiracy within the state as he describes the exam scandal as organised crime
It will also consider the documents connected with the January 2024 meeting.
Ultimately, no finding of wrongdoing has been made against Mr Anutin from the supplied information. The committee has not established how far his involvement extended, if at all.
Nonetheless, Mr Rangsiman says investigators must examine the political dimension rather than end their inquiry with civil servants. Otherwise, he argues, they risk “cutting off the political aspect.”
Join the Thai News forum, follow Thai Examiner on Facebook here
Receive all our stories as they come out on Telegram here
Follow Thai Examiner here
Further reading:
Police are to summon, charge staff found at a private property in Nonthaburi working on exam papers
Job appointments in poisoned exam process goes ahead as the impact of the scandal is still expanding
Jobs for cash corruption scandal creating shockwaves as Deputy PM promises to uncover the full truth
